Sherrod Sports Visas
P-1A, O-1A, EB-1A and essential support personnel, for players and coaches. Below is the thing that decides most tennis cases — and it is the opposite of what people assume.
Normally $50. On sale at $10 while the launch runs. Or book a consultation if you want your own case looked at.
In most sports, proving international recognition is the hard part because the evidence is scattered. Tennis has the opposite problem. The ATP, WTA and ITF publish a number next to every player who has ever won a point, and it is trivially verifiable. So petitioners lead with it.
A ranking is not recognition. A ranking is a position in a queue. Being ranked is the baseline for a professional tennis player, not a distinction above one. The question an officer asks is not are you ranked — it is what does that number mean relative to the sport. A doubles ranking in the 600s is a fact about your career; on its own it is not evidence of international recognition, and a petition that treats it as self-evident invites a refusal.
We know where that line falls because we have been on the wrong side of it. This kit includes a tennis O-1A and a P-1A for the same player that were both refused, with the Request for Evidence, our responses, the Notice of Intent to Deny and both denial decisions. It also includes an O-1A for a different player that drew an RFE and a denial, alongside the P-1 for that same player that went through.
Nobody else sells the refusals. Reading what USCIS rejected, in a real tennis file, next to what it accepted for a comparable player, is worth more than another set of approved samples.
A tennis player has no club contract and no league roster. The petitioner is an agent, an academy, a club or a foreign employer — and each of those produces a different filing. The kit shows all four shapes, from our own files.
You must plead a schedule of tournaments the player has not yet qualified to enter. The kit shows how the itinerary was written in cases that survived an RFE, and how the events were tied to the petitioner.
Which ATP/WTA/ITF exhibits were actually used, how they were framed, and how a case was built criterion by criterion rather than pointing at a number.
187 documents from tennis petitions our own agencies filed — every one checked to confirm no other firm was of record — plus fill-in templates. Personal data is redacted; the legal argument is not.
See the full contents